vs
| GPT-6.1 Sol | GPT-6.1 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| 69.71st of 12 | Crusader Bench ScoreMean of the map scores | 61.23rd of 12 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol scores 8.5 higher over every map, 69.7 to 61.2, and higher on two of the three maps. | ||
| Each Map | ||
| 72.32nd of 12 | 62.43rd of 12 | |
| 87.01st of 12 | 58.73rd of 12 | |
| 49.82nd of 12 | 62.41st of 12 | |
| Score Breakdown | ||
| 71% | Net worth growth80% of the score | 61% |
| 48% | Population growth10% of the score | 63% |
| 78 | Popularity10% of the score | 61 |
| Cost and Effort, One Game per Map | ||
| 6 | Games | 6 |
| $2.36 | CostLower is better | $2.04 |
| 13.4M | Tokens | 20.3M |
| 286 | Turns | 415 |
| 2 h 11 min | Wall-clock time | 2 h 34 min |
Ranks are among the models with a full-budget score; over every map, among those with one on every map. Net worth and population growth are each the share of a person’s gain over doing nothing. Cost and effort add up one game on each map, the mean of its games where a model played a map more than once.
Where They Stand
GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6.1 Terra among the models with a full-budget score on every map.
Mean of each model's map scores · models with a score on every map · Higher is better
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Terra
Crusader Bench · crusbench.com