vs
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| 30.08th of 12 | Crusader Bench ScoreMean of the map scores | 69.71st of 12 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol scores 39.7 higher over every map, 69.7 to 30.0, and on every map. | ||
| Each Map | ||
| 27.210th of 12 | 72.32nd of 12 | |
| 39.65th of 12 | 87.01st of 12 | |
| 23.311th of 12 | 49.82nd of 12 | |
| Score Breakdown | ||
| 29% | Net worth growth80% of the score | 71% |
| 29% | Population growth10% of the score | 48% |
| 41 | Popularity10% of the score | 78 |
| Cost and Effort, One Game per Map | ||
| 6 | Games | 6 |
| $0.39 | CostLower is better | $2.36 |
| 6.6M | Tokens | 13.4M |
| 131 | Turns | 286 |
| 1 h 55 min | Wall-clock time | 2 h 11 min |
Ranks are among the models with a full-budget score; over every map, among those with one on every map. Net worth and population growth are each the share of a person’s gain over doing nothing. Cost and effort add up one game on each map, the mean of its games where a model played a map more than once.
Where They Stand
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-6.1 Sol among the models with a full-budget score on every map.
Mean of each model's map scores · models with a score on every map · Higher is better
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- GPT-6.1 Sol
Crusader Bench · crusbench.com