vs
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Muse Wonder | |
|---|---|---|
| 61.23rd of 12 | Crusader Bench ScoreMean of the map scores | 31.17th of 12 |
| GPT-6.1 Terra scores 30.1 higher over every map, 61.2 to 31.1, and on every map. | ||
| Each Map | ||
| 62.43rd of 12 | 38.06th of 12 | |
| 58.73rd of 12 | 23.97th of 12 | |
| 62.41st of 12 | 31.68th of 12 | |
| Score Breakdown | ||
| 61% | Net worth growth80% of the score | 28% |
| 63% | Population growth10% of the score | 32% |
| 61 | Popularity10% of the score | 59 |
| Cost and Effort, One Game per Map | ||
| 6 | Games | 6 |
| $2.04 | CostLower is better | $5.07 |
| 20.3M | Tokens | 8.5M |
| 415 | Turns | 169 |
| 2 h 34 min | Wall-clock time | 1 h 57 min |
Ranks are among the models with a full-budget score; over every map, among those with one on every map. Net worth and population growth are each the share of a person’s gain over doing nothing. Cost and effort add up one game on each map, the mean of its games where a model played a map more than once.
Where They Stand
GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Wonder among the models with a full-budget score on every map.
Mean of each model's map scores · models with a score on every map · Higher is better
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- Muse Wonder
Crusader Bench · crusbench.com