vs
| GPT-6 Luna | GPT-6.1 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| 25.310th of 12 | Crusader Bench ScoreMean of the map scores | 61.23rd of 12 |
| GPT-6.1 Terra scores 35.9 higher over every map, 61.2 to 25.3, and on every map. | ||
| Each Map | ||
| 33.89th of 12 | 62.43rd of 12 | |
| 13.010th of 12 | 58.73rd of 12 | |
| 29.19th of 12 | 62.41st of 12 | |
| Score Breakdown | ||
| 20% | Net worth growth80% of the score | 61% |
| 30% | Population growth10% of the score | 63% |
| 65 | Popularity10% of the score | 61 |
| Cost and Effort, One Game per Map | ||
| 6 | Games | 6 |
| $0.37 | CostLower is better | $2.04 |
| 16.9M | Tokens | 20.3M |
| 351 | Turns | 415 |
| 3 h 2 min | Wall-clock time | 2 h 34 min |
Ranks are among the models with a full-budget score; over every map, among those with one on every map. Net worth and population growth are each the share of a person’s gain over doing nothing. Cost and effort add up one game on each map, the mean of its games where a model played a map more than once.
Where They Stand
GPT-6 Luna and GPT-6.1 Terra among the models with a full-budget score on every map.
Mean of each model's map scores · models with a score on every map · Higher is better
- GPT-6 Luna
- GPT-6.1 Terra
Crusader Bench · crusbench.com