vs
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| 30.08th of 12 | Crusader Bench ScoreMean of the map scores | 3.712th of 12 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores 26.3 higher over every map, 30.0 to 3.7, and on every map. | ||
| Each Map | ||
| 27.210th of 12 | 21.112th of 12 | |
| 39.65th of 12 | -29.312th of 12 | |
| 23.311th of 12 | 19.312th of 12 | |
| Score Breakdown | ||
| 29% | Net worth growth80% of the score | -7% |
| 29% | Population growth10% of the score | 24% |
| 41 | Popularity10% of the score | 68 |
| Cost and Effort, One Game per Map | ||
| 6 | Games | 6 |
| $0.39 | CostLower is better | $0.27 |
| 6.6M | Tokens | 7.2M |
| 131 | Turns | 166 |
| 1 h 55 min | Wall-clock time | 1 h 46 min |
Ranks are among the models with a full-budget score; over every map, among those with one on every map. Net worth and population growth are each the share of a person’s gain over doing nothing. Cost and effort add up one game on each map, the mean of its games where a model played a map more than once.
Where They Stand
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 5.3 Flash among the models with a full-budget score on every map.
Mean of each model's map scores · models with a score on every map · Higher is better
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- GLM 5.3 Flash
Crusader Bench · crusbench.com