vs
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| 32.16th of 12 | Crusader Bench ScoreMean of the map scores | 32.15th of 12 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro score the same over every map, 32.1. | ||
| Each Map | ||
| 33.98th of 12 | 40.94th of 12 | |
| 28.16th of 12 | 17.88th of 12 | |
| 34.26th of 12 | 37.64th of 12 | |
| Score Breakdown | ||
| 29% | Net worth growth80% of the score | 27% |
| 21% | Population growth10% of the score | 40% |
| 65 | Popularity10% of the score | 63 |
| Cost and Effort, One Game per Map | ||
| 6 | Games | 6 |
| ~$1.54 | CostLower is better | ~$3.40 |
| 5.8M | Tokens | 8.7M |
| 105 | Turns | 168 |
| 1 h 13 min | Wall-clock time | 2 h 20 min |
Ranks are among the models with a full-budget score; over every map, among those with one on every map. Net worth and population growth are each the share of a person’s gain over doing nothing. Cost and effort add up one game on each map, the mean of its games where a model played a map more than once.
Where They Stand
Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro among the models with a full-budget score on every map.
Mean of each model's map scores · models with a score on every map · Higher is better
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro
Crusader Bench · crusbench.com