vs
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| 32.16th of 12 | Crusader Bench ScoreMean of the map scores | 30.08th of 12 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 2.1 higher over every map, 32.1 to 30.0, and higher on two of the three maps. | ||
| Each Map | ||
| 33.98th of 12 | 27.210th of 12 | |
| 28.16th of 12 | 39.65th of 12 | |
| 34.26th of 12 | 23.311th of 12 | |
| Score Breakdown | ||
| 29% | Net worth growth80% of the score | 29% |
| 21% | Population growth10% of the score | 29% |
| 65 | Popularity10% of the score | 41 |
| Cost and Effort, One Game per Map | ||
| 6 | Games | 6 |
| ~$1.54 | CostLower is better | $0.39 |
| 5.8M | Tokens | 6.6M |
| 105 | Turns | 131 |
| 1 h 13 min | Wall-clock time | 1 h 55 min |
Ranks are among the models with a full-budget score; over every map, among those with one on every map. Net worth and population growth are each the share of a person’s gain over doing nothing. Cost and effort add up one game on each map, the mean of its games where a model played a map more than once.
Where They Stand
Claude Sonnet 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 among the models with a full-budget score on every map.
Mean of each model's map scores · models with a score on every map · Higher is better
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Crusader Bench · crusbench.com